Some hard facts: Forty years ago there were, according to the best estimates, about 5000 icebears alive. Then came a period of uninterupted global warming. And how many icebears are left now, as of today? 25000 (twentyfivethousand) according to the best count/estimate. Thus there does at least not seem to be an imediate risk for toal icebear extinction.

Furthermore, it has been carefully calculated that if the whole world followed the Kyoto protokoll the next hundred years, <0,1 icebear would be saved. A better way of saving icebear lives would be not to allow them to be hunted and shot. 49 were killed last year only in the West Hudson Valley.

So how then can the meterological and other scientists of the world be in almost total agreement on the danger of fossile burning and sequential global warming = icebear extinction? That is an interesting question. What say you Karl Raimund Popper?

How many of the medical truths, eg regarding glaucoma, that we are in total agreement on today, could be as easily refuted? Another interesting question for Mr.Popper

oh

go to page 1